Release regime data trove from belarus1/24/2024 ![]() Newsroom leaders tell of taking extra security precautions when discussing coverage plans. Many journalists told CPJ that they are concerned not just for their own personal safety, but for friends and family who may be targeted along with them. These attacks – or the mere possibility of them – have already had a chilling effect on sources, who fear their conversations with reporters could expose them to retribution from authorities. In interviews with reporters, tech experts, and press freedom advocates in multiple countries, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has found that the fear of surveillance extends far beyond those able to prove infiltration of their phones. David Kaye: Here’s what world leaders must do about spyware.CPJ’s recommendations to protect journalists against spyware.But the development of high-tech “zero-click” spyware – the kind that takes over a phone without a user’s knowledge or interaction – poses an existential crisis for journalism and the future of press freedom around the world. There’s nothing new about governments or criminal gangs spying on journalists or activists they fear might expose or discredit them. You assume that your conversations are being read by someone else.” What happens is that you’re just paranoid all the time. “A lot of people are scared of writing me, they’re scared that my phone is watched. “I know for a fact that a lot of people are scared to talk to me,” she said. But working under the constant threat of surveillance has made her job that much harder. Since then, Alami has continued to write and report for The New York Times and other publications. That was when Alami realized that just about every precaution she had been taking was now obsolete. ![]() However, the Facebook disclosure showed that surveillance software could be inserted onto any phone via any app. Like Signal, WhatsApp uses end-to-end encryption to scramble all calls, messages, audio, photo, and video both in transmission as well as on the company’s server – an important security feature that prevents governments from intercepting or subpoenaing communications. Moroccan authorities had allegedly exploited this now-patched flaw to gain secret access to the phones of journalists and activists, including Aboubakr Jamai, CPJ’s International Press Freedom Award winner in 2003. That feeling of safety from using end-to-end encryption evaporated in 2019, when WhatsApp-owner Facebook revealed a vulnerability that allowed hackers to infiltrate smartphones simply by calling someone via the messaging app, without the target having to click on a link. “For some time, we felt really safe on Signal,” she told the Committee to Protect Journalists in an interview. She avoided using certain keywords and full names in her communications and conducted interviews over Signal, a messaging app that encrypts all content before it leaves a phone. As a journalist from Morocco, a state with a track record of intercepting phone calls and messages of political rivals, activists, and journalists, she habitually took precautions to protect her sources. How zero-click surveillance threatens reporters, sources, and global press freedom By Fred GuterlĪida Alami has always been wary of surveillance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |